Friday, May 10, 2013

Final show and tell post: Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo


My show and tell play this round is Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo by, Rajiv Joseph. It was written in the early 2000’s and was produced for the first time at Kirk Douglas Theatre in Culvar, California in 2009. It quickly made its way onto many more stages including Broadway’s Richard Rodgers Theatre, and was honored with the outstanding New American Play award in 2008. I would consider this a play worth reading, I was impressed with the abrupt plot changes, and the way Joseph was able to incorporate the lines of the ghosts so congenially.

This play takes place in several different locations in Baghdad in 2003. In the first scene, American soldiers Kev and Tom guard the zoo, which is the home of the plays protagonist, the tiger. Tom took part in murdering Uday Hussein and cares only to regain possession of the golden gun and toilet he stole from him. Unfortunately, the tiger bites off Tom’s hand in the very beginning making that a difficult task to complete. Kev kills the tiger for eating Tom’s hand, and is actively haunted by him for the rest of the play, turning Kev entirely lucid and eventually sending him to the loony bin. Tom hires a translator named Musa who ends up connecting all the characters in the play. Musa has a loyalty to Uday, even though he raped and abused his little sister Nadia before his death. However, he is still employed by Tom and haunted by the ghost of Uday and his cowardice choices. The interactions between the living characters and the ghosts form the skeleton of this plot. The twists and discoveries come from inescapable and ever-changing fates that keep the characters in constant pursuit of one another, until there is nothing left.

This play is written from the perspective of many characters all branching from 1 of 3 worlds. There is the world of the tiger as an animal, there is the world of the living characters as humans, and there is a world of the dead characters that still linger and can affect the outcome of the given plot. This is something you realize once you start reading because the script flows quickly with no indication of who is talking to who or who can hear who, from the author. There is so much Joseph wants his audience to recognize and follow in such a short play, that its imperative for the reader to be able to connect with and bounce back and forth with from different perspectives, worlds, and lines of communication without getting lost. His choice to write the lines straight though with no side notes was clearly done in order to help us view the story the way he intended. Another choice that stood out to me was how powerful the ghosts were in regards to their affect on the other characters. Normally, one would assume the ghosts had no actual control because they weren’t alive, therefore, I believe Joseph wrote their actions to have consequences for a reason. The theme and message of this play has a lot to do with mind control; with how easy it is to loose, yet how necessary it is to have. Joseph uses the uncanny ability of the ghosts to control the characters and significantly manipulate their futures to reveal how the fragility of ones own mind. This choice reiterates the unifying principle of this piece and leaves the audience overtly aware of the power of the mind. 

No comments:

Post a Comment